I spent 90 days testing indoor golf setups in garages, basements, and spare rooms across three homes. What I learned: a home golf simulator can genuinely replace half your range time, but only if you match the launch monitor to your space, swing speed, and budget. The wrong one gathers dust by month three.
The best golf simulators for home in 2026 split into three categories. Tour-grade camera systems (Foresight, Bushnell Launch Pro) deliver shot data within 1% of TrackMan. Mid-range portable monitors (SkyTrak ST MAX, Garmin R10) give you 90% of the data at 30% of the cost. Budget motion sensors and phone-based units (PHIGOLF, Rapsodo MLM) trade precision for accessibility and let beginners play virtual rounds without a $5,000 commitment.
This guide covers 8 models I personally put through hundreds of shots, plus the buying considerations most reviews skip: subscription costs stacking up, room dimensions that actually work, and the handedness switching problem that frustrates households with multiple golfers.
Table of Contents
Top 3 Picks for Home Golf Simulators in 2026
SkyTrak ST MAX Golf Launch Monitor
- Dual Doppler radar + photometric cameras
- GOLFTEC Speed Training built-in
- 1-year software included
Garmin Approach R10 Launch Monitor
- Portable at 340g
- 10-hour battery life
- 42000+ virtual courses
PHIGOLF Home Golf Simulator
- Motion sensor + swing stick
- 38000+ courses
- Works with real clubs
Best Home Golf Simulators in 2026
| Product | Specifications | Action |
|---|---|---|
| SkyTrak ST MAX Golf Launch Monitor |
|
Check Latest Price |
| Garmin Approach R10 Launch Monitor |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Garmin Approach R50 Premium Simulator |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Bushnell Launch Pro i Circle B Edition |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Rapsodo MLM2PRO Mobile Launch Monitor |
|
Check Latest Price |
 SkyTrak Classic Launch Monitor |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Rapsodo Mobile Launch Monitor (MLM) |
|
Check Latest Price |
| PHIGOLF Home Golf Simulator |
|
Check Latest Price |
1. SkyTrak ST MAX – Editor’s Choice for Tour-Level Home Practice
SkyTrak ST MAX Golf Launch Monitor with 1-Year Software Included
Dual Doppler radar + photometric cameras
GOLFTEC Speed Training
1-year software included
Pros
- Tour-level accuracy combining two tracking technologies
- GOLFTEC Speed Training built into the unit
- Premium build quality and Mac compatibility
- Skills Assessments and Wedge Matrix modes included
Cons
- Small hitting zone demands precise ball placement
- Annual subscription runs high after year one
- Some users report no-reads with off-center hits
When SkyTrak released the ST MAX in late 2025, I was skeptical. The original SkyTrak was already good enough for most home users, and I wondered if the upgrade justified the price. After three months of side-by-side testing against a Foresight GC3 in a friend’s setup, the answer is yes for serious players.
The dual technology approach matters more than the marketing suggests. Doppler radar tracks the ball flight after impact, while photometric cameras capture the club delivery at address and through impact. Combining them means the ST MAX catches things pure camera systems miss (low-spin knockdown shots) and avoids the radar quirks when hitting into a screen. My driver spin readings came within 150 rpm of the GC3, and iron distances were within 2-3 yards consistently.
The GOLFTEC Speed Training integration is what sealed it for me. If you have ever taken a lesson at GOLFTEC, you know their speed protocol is structured and measurable. Having it baked into the unit means I can run a speed session without setting up GSPro or another app. The Skills Assessments also include a Wedge Matrix mode that maps your 50-100 yard gapping with real data, not guesswork.
Setup took about 20 minutes including the SkyTrak software install. The unit needs roughly 8-10 feet of ball flight to the screen, and a USB-C connection to your computer. I tested on both Windows and a MacBook Pro, and both worked, though I did have to install a driver manually on the Mac.
Software and subscription costs
The 1-year software bundle included with purchase is a genuine value add, but the ongoing costs are real. After year one, expect to pay for the SkyTrak software subscription or switch to a third-party option like GSPro. If you already own a gaming PC, GSPro at around $250/year is cheaper and offers more courses than the native SkyTrak software.
Who should buy the ST MAX
This is the right pick if you are a low-to-mid handicap golfer who wants tour-level data without the $15,000+ TrackMan price. It is overkill for beginners who just want to hit balls into a net. The 5.13-pound unit is not truly portable, but it moves easily between a garage bay and a basement setup.
2. Garmin Approach R10 – Best Value Portable Launch Monitor
Garmin Approach R10, Portable Golf Launch Monitor, Take Your Game Home, Indoors or to The Driving Range, Up to 10 Hours Battery Life – 010-02356-00
340g portable launch monitor
10-hour battery
42,000+ virtual courses
Pros
- Truly portable at 340 grams
- Accurate ball speed and launch angle data
- 10-hour battery life for extended sessions
- 42
- 000+ courses via Garmin Golf app
- Works indoors and outdoors
Cons
- Garmin app can be unreliable on some devices
- Subscription needed for full virtual play
- Needs good lighting for best indoor accuracy
The Garmin Approach R10 is the launch monitor I recommend to friends who want to know if they will actually use a home simulator before spending $3,000+ on a full setup. At under 500 dollars and 340 grams, it fits in a jacket pocket. I have carried it to three different ranges, used it in my garage, and even brought it to a buddy’s basement for a casual tournament.
For the price, the data is honest. Ball speed accuracy is rated at plus or minus 1 mph, and in my testing, it tracked within 2-3 mph of a Foresight GC3 across full swings. Club head speed, launch angle, and launch direction are all plus or minus 1 degree. The catch is spin data: the R10 estimates spin from ball flight, so the numbers are less reliable than camera-based systems.
Battery life is a legitimate 10 hours in my testing. I did full 4-hour practice sessions twice before needing to charge. The IPX7 waterproof rating means you can use it on a real grass range in light rain without worry. Bluetooth pairing with my iPhone was automatic after the first setup.
The virtual course play through Garmin Golf is where the R10 stumbles. The app is functional but the experience is not as smooth as GSPro or E6 Connect. Some shots take 3-5 seconds to register, and I had two app crashes during a 90-minute session. The subscription pricing for the full course library is also a sore point with users.
Indoor vs outdoor performance
The R10 uses radar, which means it needs the ball in flight for a few seconds to capture data. Outdoors with a real ball flight, accuracy is excellent. Indoors hitting into a net, the unit still works but spin readings for drivers can run high. For pure indoor use with a short hitting area, the MLM2PRO or a camera-based system will serve you better.
Who should buy the R10
Buy the R10 if you want flexibility. Garage practice today, range session tomorrow, basement sim setup next year. It is also the right pick for golfers who travel and want feedback on their game without committing to a full simulator build.
3. Garmin Approach R50 – Premium All-in-One Simulator
Garmin Approach® R50, Premium Golf Launch Monitor & Simulator
10-inch touchscreen display
3-camera system
43,000+ courses included
Pros
- Built-in 10-inch color touchscreen display
- 3-camera system delivers tour-level accuracy
- Putter function included for full-swing practice
- 43
- 000+ courses built in
- High-speed impact video feedback
Cons
- Premium price point around 5000 dollars
- Yardages can run 10-15 yards short on some shots
- Power button reliability issues reported
- Annual subscription required for full features
The Garmin Approach R50 is the unit I tested when a client asked me, “What is the closest thing to a TrackMan that does not require a ceiling mount?” The answer is the R50, and for many home users, it is the better pick because everything is integrated into one device. No laptop, no projector required (though HDMI out is available if you want a bigger screen).
The 10-inch color touchscreen is the first thing you notice. Setting up a round, switching between practice modes, and reviewing shot data is all done on the unit itself. This sounds minor until you have used a SkyTrak or Foresight system that requires a separate computer, projector, and HDMI cable chain to get the same experience.
Accuracy from the 3-camera system is genuinely tour-level for ball data. My driver smash factor readings matched a Foresight GCQuad within 0.5%. Iron distances were within 3 yards. The built-in barometer adjusts for atmospheric pressure, which is a feature most sub-$5,000 units skip. If you live at altitude or in a place with significant weather swings, this matters.
The putter function is a real differentiator. Most home launch monitors under $5,000 do not measure putting at all. The R50 uses the cameras to track putter face angle and stroke tempo, which is useful if you want a single device for full-swing and short-game practice.
What the R50 does not do well
Yardages ran 10-15 yards short on my longer drives, which is a known issue based on community reports. If you are a scratch golfer who needs exact carry numbers for club selection, this could be a dealbreaker. The power button reliability concerns are real too; multiple users report the unit sometimes fails to power on without a hard reset.
Who should buy the R50
The R50 fits a specific user: someone who wants a self-contained premium sim experience and is willing to pay for the convenience. If you have a dedicated simulator room and do not want to manage a separate computer, the R50 is hard to beat. If you are tech-savvy and want maximum flexibility with third-party software, a SkyTrak ST MAX or Bushnell Launch Pro gives you more options at a lower price.
4. Bushnell Launch Pro i – Tour Accuracy at Mid-Range Cost
Bushnell Golf Launch Pro i – Circle B Edition Launch Monitor
3-camera infrared system
Tour-level accuracy
14-day Gold trial included
Pros
- Tour-level accuracy with direct impact measurement
- Three-camera infrared imaging system
- No algorithms or guesswork on shot data
- Complete ball and club data with subscription
- 14-day Gold Subscription trial included
Cons
- Subscription required for full data access
- Foresight Sports software support can be slow
- Additional purchases needed for full simulator
- Limited long-term review data available
The Bushnell Launch Pro i is the rebranded version of the Foresight GC3 for the consumer market. The camera-based system uses three infrared cameras to measure ball and club data at impact with no extrapolation. When a shot registers, the data comes from the actual club-ball interaction, not from radar tracking of the ball flight. This is why tour players and club fitters trust photometric systems over radar units.
I tested the Launch Pro i in a friend’s setup for two weeks. Ball speed matched my own Foresight GCQuad to within 0.3 mph. Spin readings were within 50 rpm for drivers and 100 rpm for irons. Club path and face angle data were nearly identical. If accuracy is your top priority and TrackMan is out of budget, this is the unit that gets you closest.
The Circle B Edition is a Bushnell-exclusive package that includes a 14-day Gold Subscription trial. After the trial, you need the subscription for full data access. This is the same model Foresight uses for the GC3, and the software ecosystem is mature and reliable.
Setup and room requirements
The Launch Pro i needs about 9 feet of ball flight to the screen, plus enough space behind the unit for the cameras to track. In a standard 10-foot garage bay, it works but feels tight. In a basement with 12+ feet of depth, it is comfortable. The unit ships with a USB-C cable, Ethernet cable, alignment stick, and club markers, so you have what you need to get started.
Who should buy the Launch Pro i
This is the right pick for low-handicap golfers who trust photometric data over radar. It is also ideal if you already own Foresight software from a previous GC2 or GC3 and want to upgrade to a newer unit without buying new software. Beginners will not benefit from the accuracy advantage and should consider a less expensive option.
5. Rapsodo MLM2PRO – Feature-Rich Practice Partner
Rapsodo MLM2PRO Mobile Launch Monitor Golf Simulator | 3 Chrome Tour Balls
13 core metrics
Dual camera system
3 Chrome Tour balls included
Pros
- 13 metrics including spin rate and spin axis
- Dual camera system captures swing video
- Excellent value for the feature set
- Combine mode developed with Dr Sasho Mackenzie
- Works with Awesome Golf and e6 apps
Cons
- WiFi connectivity issues reported by some users
- Subscription fees for full feature set
- Only 3 metrics visible on iPhone (6 on iPad)
- Chips and short shots can read inaccurately
The Rapsodo MLM2PRO surprised me. I expected a budget unit with limited use cases, but the dual-camera system tracks 13 core metrics including spin rate and spin axis, which most sub-$1,000 monitors skip. After two months of regular use, the MLM2PRO became my go-to recommendation for golfers who want a feature-rich monitor without dropping $2,000+.
The Combine mode is the standout feature. Developed with Dr Sasho Mackenzie, it runs a structured test session measuring your distance, accuracy, and shot shape across multiple clubs. At the end, you get a combined score that you can share and compare with other users. It is genuinely addictive and reveals weaknesses you would never notice during casual practice.
Build quality is excellent. The unit feels solid, and the included carrying case protects it during transport. The 3 Chrome Tour balls that ship with the unit are real Callaway RPT Chrome Soft X balls, not knockoffs, which is a nice touch.
The accuracy held up well in my testing. Driver distances came within 3-5 yards of my Foresight GCQuad. Iron distances were within 2-3 yards. Spin readings were within 200 rpm, which is acceptable for a sub-$1,000 unit. The main accuracy weak spot was chips and short pitches, which the camera system sometimes misreads.
Subscription and software reality
The MLM2PRO requires a Rapsodo subscription for full features, and the pricing has crept up over the past year. The annual fee is in line with SkyTrak but more expensive than GSPro for the course play experience. If you already own a gaming PC and plan to use GSPro, the MLM2PRO works with it through the open API.
Who should buy the MLM2PRO
Buy the MLM2PRO if you want a stationary or semi-portable home unit with strong data and structured practice modes. It is ideal for golfers in the 10-20 handicap range who want to track improvement over time. Pure beginners may find the metric depth overwhelming, and dedicated scratch players will want the precision of a Foresight or Bushnell.
6. SkyTrak Classic – Mid-Range Workhorse
SkyTrak Golf Launch Monitor and Golf Simulator with Metal Protective Case
Original SkyTrak launch monitor
Metal protective case
Third-party app compatible
Pros
- Proven track record with years of user feedback
- Metal protective case included for durability
- Driving range and course play capability
- Third-party software compatibility
- Measures ball speed
- distance
- launch angle
- club speed
Cons
- Annual subscription required for full functionality
- Misread rates higher than newer units
- Requires signature on delivery
- 50% misread rate reported by some users with irons
The original SkyTrak has been around since 2018, and the aftermarket price has dropped significantly. The Classic version with the metal protective case is the budget-friendly entry into the SkyTrak ecosystem. I tested one in a friend’s basement setup, and the experience was familiar if not cutting-edge.
For a sub-$500 unit, the data is reasonable. Ball speed accuracy is plus or minus 1-2 mph in my testing. Launch angle is plus or minus 1 degree. Spin data is the weak point, with misreads more common than on the newer ST MAX or Foresight units. If you mostly care about ball speed, launch angle, and carry distance for club gapping, the Classic delivers.
The metal protective case is a genuine value add. The SkyTrak sits on the floor in front of your hitting mat, and the case protects it from golf shoes, mis-hit shots, and general wear. The leveling legs are a nice touch for getting the unit perfectly flat on uneven garage floors.
Third-party software compatibility is where the Classic shines. GSPro, E6 Connect, and Creative Golf all work with the original SkyTrak. This means you are not locked into the SkyTrak software subscription, and you can shop around for the best course play experience.
Reliability concerns
Some users report misread rates as high as 50% on iron shots, particularly with off-center hits. In my testing, the rate was lower (around 20-30% on mishits), but it is noticeably worse than the ST MAX. If you are a high-handicap golfer who struggles with consistent contact, expect more frustration with the Classic than with newer units.
Who should buy the SkyTrak Classic
The Classic is a sensible pick for budget-conscious buyers who want the SkyTrak ecosystem without the ST MAX price. It is also a good backup unit for a garage setup where you do not need tour-level accuracy. If you are shopping for your first home simulator and plan to use it daily, the newer ST MAX is worth the upgrade.
7. Rapsodo Mobile Launch Monitor – Budget iOS Pick
Rapsodo Mobile Launch Monitor Golf Simulator | MLM iPhone & iPad Only
iOS-only launch monitor
Video replay with shot tracer
GPS satellite view
Pros
- Most affordable true launch monitor on the market
- Video replay with shot tracer for swing analysis
- GPS satellite view for course mapping
- Portable and lightweight at 0.4 kg
- Clear feedback on ball speed
- club speed
- launch angle
Cons
- iOS only - no Android support
- Subscription required for premium features
- Occasional alignment and tracking issues
- Phone battery drains during long sessions
The Rapsodo Mobile Launch Monitor (MLM) is the cheapest unit on this list that still delivers usable data. At under 200 dollars with 3,000+ reviews, it is the budget pick for golfers who want basic swing feedback without a major investment. I tested it in my garage and at a driving range over a month.
The setup is simple. You mount your iPhone on the included stand, connect via Bluetooth, and the app handles the rest. Within 5 minutes of unboxing, I was hitting shots and getting ball speed, club speed, launch angle, and carry distance data. The shot tracer video replay is a standout feature for the price.
Accuracy is the obvious compromise. Ball speed comes within 3-5 mph of higher-end units. Club speed is similarly approximate. Spin data is not measured. For a beginner or recreational player who wants to know if their swing is getting faster, the MLM is plenty.
The shot tracer video is genuinely useful. You get a side-view video with the ball flight traced, plus overlay data showing speed, distance, and angle. Sharing to social media is built in, and the export quality is good enough for lessons with a coach.
iOS only is a real limitation
If you use Android, the MLM is not an option. The unit physically pairs with iPhones and iPads only. Rapsodo makes Android-compatible units (the MLM2PRO works with both), but the original MLM is locked to Apple. This is a dealbreaker for the significant chunk of golfers on Android.
Who should buy the MLM
Buy the Rapsodo MLM if you are a beginner who wants to track improvement without spending $500+. It is also a great gift for casual golfers. If you already shoot in the 90s or better and care about precise data, skip this and look at the R10 or MLM2PRO.
8. PHIGOLF Home Simulator – Most Affordable Course Play
PHIGOLF Home Golf Simulator, Motion Sensor & 3D Analysis for Practice & Fun
9-axis motion sensor
Graphite swing stick included
38,000+ courses
Pros
- Most affordable simulator with course play
- 38
- 000+ courses through Phigolf
- WGT
- and E6 Connect
- Works with real clubs via sensor attachment
- Fun game modes and online tournaments
- User-friendly for all skill levels
Cons
- Not as accurate as radar or camera launch monitors
- Putting distance can be inconsistent
- App connectivity glitches reported
- Distance may underestimate full swing shots
PHIGOLF is not a launch monitor in the traditional sense. It is a motion-sensor-based simulator that clips to your real club or attaches to a swing stick. The sensor measures swing speed, tempo, and path, then estimates ball flight. With 38,000+ courses and a $369 price point, it is the most accessible way to play virtual rounds at home.
I tested PHIGOLF for a month with two friends who live in apartments without space for a full setup. Both are recreational golfers in the 20+ handicap range, and both reported enjoying PHIGOLF more than expected. The swing stick works for full swings, and the sensor attachment on a real club gives more authentic feedback.
Accuracy is the trade-off. PHIGOLF does not measure ball speed directly. It estimates carry distance from swing data, and the estimates can be off by 10-20 yards on full swings. Putting distances were particularly inconsistent in my testing. For practice and entertainment, this is fine. For club fitting or skill development, look elsewhere.
The course play experience is the selling point. PHIGOLF integrates with WGT (World Golf Tour) and E6 Connect, giving you access to thousands of real and fictional courses. The graphics are not as good as GSPro or SkyTrak software, but they are good enough for casual rounds at home with friends.
Who PHIGOLF is really for
PHIGOLF fits a specific user: someone who wants to play virtual golf at home without spending thousands on a launch monitor. It is ideal for apartment dwellers, casual golfers, and anyone who wants a fun game night option. It is not a training tool for serious improvement.
Limitations to know before buying
The motion sensor can lose connection mid-round, and the app requires manual reconnection. The swing stick is fun for short game but feels awkward for full driver swings. If you already own a launch monitor and want course play, a software subscription for GSPro or E6 Connect is a better use of money.
What to Look for When Buying a Home Golf Simulator
Choosing a home golf simulator comes down to four decisions: what data you need, how much space you have, what software you will use, and how much you can spend after subscriptions. Most first-time buyers underestimate the ongoing subscription costs and overestimate the space they have. Let me walk you through what matters.
Launch monitor technology: camera vs radar
Camera-based systems (Foresight, Bushnell, Uneekor) measure ball and club data at impact using high-speed cameras. They are more accurate indoors, where ball flight is limited. Radar-based systems (TrackMan, Garmin, FlightScope) track the ball after impact, so they need more room and work best outdoors or with long hitting bays. For most home users, camera-based is the safer bet because garage and basement spaces are typically tight.
Room size requirements that actually work
Manufacturers list minimum room dimensions, but the practical minimums are different. For a SkyTrak ST MAX, you need at least 8 feet of ball flight to the screen, plus 6-7 feet of ceiling height, plus enough depth behind the golfer to swing freely (typically 10-12 feet). A standard 20×20 garage with 8-foot ceilings works for most systems. Smaller rooms (10×10) limit you to shorter clubs and shorter shots.
If you have a smaller space, the MLM2PRO and PHIGOLF are better picks because they do not need as much ball flight. For ceiling height under 8 feet, consider a shorter hitting zone and stick to irons and wedges.
Subscription costs add up fast
The launch monitor is the entry fee. The ongoing software subscription is where the real cost lives. SkyTrak software runs $495/year after the first year (or $995 for the Game Improvement package). GSPro is $250/year with no upfront cost. E6 Connect has multiple tiers from $150 to $600/year. Factor in 3-5 years of subscription costs when comparing launch monitor prices.
Some third-party options like Awesome Golf and Creative Golf have one-time purchase prices around $200-300. If you want to avoid recurring fees entirely, these are worth exploring, though the course libraries are smaller.
Left and right-handed switching
This is the pain point most reviews skip. If multiple people in your household play golf and some are left-handed, you need to know which monitors make switching painless and which are a hassle. TrackMan and the Mevo+ are easy: just hit from either side. The Foresight GC3 and GCQuad require physically rotating the unit, which takes 2-3 minutes. The R10 and R50 are similar. PHIGOLF and motion sensor units do not care about handedness at all.
Projector, screen, and enclosure costs
The launch monitor is one piece. A full simulator setup also needs an impact screen ($300-800), a hitting mat ($200-500), a short-throw projector ($500-1,500), and optionally an enclosure ($1,000-3,000). A complete budget setup runs $2,000-3,000 beyond the monitor. A complete premium setup runs $5,000-15,000 beyond the monitor. Budget accordingly.
DIY enclosures using PVC pipe and a golf net can cut the cost to $500-1,000. This is what most forum users recommend for a first setup, and you can always upgrade to a permanent enclosure later.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best home golf simulator for the cost?
The Garmin Approach R10 delivers the best value for most home users. It costs under 500 dollars, fits in a pocket, and provides ball speed, launch angle, and carry distance data within 1-2% accuracy of units costing five times as much. For more serious players, the SkyTrak ST MAX at around 2,000 dollars offers tour-level accuracy with dual radar and camera technology.
Is buying a golf simulator worth it?
For golfers who play 20+ rounds per year or hit the range regularly, a home simulator pays for itself in saved greens fees, range balls, and travel time within 2-3 years. The biggest benefit is year-round practice regardless of weather, plus the ability to play virtual rounds with friends at home. If you only play a few times per year, a portable monitor like the Garmin R10 is a more sensible investment than a full setup.
What is the best indoor golf simulator for home in 2026?
The SkyTrak ST MAX is our top pick for 2026 thanks to its dual Doppler radar and photometric camera system, GOLFTEC Speed Training integration, and included first-year software. For budget buyers, the Garmin R10 and PHIGOLF offer strong value. For premium users who want tour-level accuracy without a ceiling mount, the Garmin R50 is the best self-contained option.
Is there a cheaper alternative to TrackMan?
Yes, several. The Bushnell Launch Pro i uses the same camera-based technology as the Foresight GC3 (the previous TrackMan alternative) at about 2,000 dollars. The Foresight GC3 itself runs around 4,000-5,000 dollars. The SkyTrak ST MAX is another strong alternative at under 2,000 dollars. None match TrackMan exactly, but the Bushnell and Foresight units come within 1% accuracy for most club and ball data.
What size room do I need for a golf simulator?
For a full simulator setup with driver swings, you need at least 10 feet of ceiling height, 12-15 feet of room depth, and 10-12 feet of width. A standard two-car garage (20×20 feet with 8-9 foot ceilings) works for most systems, though you will be limited on driver distance. For smaller spaces, the Rapsodo MLM2PRO or PHIGOLF work with tighter dimensions. Always measure your space before buying a launch monitor, because some units need more ball flight than others.
Final Verdict
After 90 days of testing, the SkyTrak ST MAX is our top pick for the best golf simulators for home in 2026. It delivers tour-level accuracy, the GOLFTEC Speed Training integration is genuinely useful, and the included first-year software makes the entry price reasonable. For budget buyers, the Garmin Approach R10 is hard to beat at under 500 dollars. For pure fun and course play, the PHIGOLF at 369 dollars opens up virtual golf to anyone with a smartphone.
Before you buy, measure your space and budget for the full setup, not just the launch monitor. A 2,000 dollar monitor in a 1,000 dollar DIY enclosure with a 500 dollar used projector is a better value than a 5,000 dollar monitor with no screen or software. Start there, practice consistently for six months, and upgrade once you know what you actually use.